Conservation Motivation: Using Hypocrisy and Self-Efficacy to Induce Environment Behavioral Change

Date
2012
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Producer
Director
Performer
Choreographer
Costume Designer
Music
Videographer
Lighting Designer
Set Designer
Crew Member
Funder
Rehearsal Director
Concert Coordinator
Moderator
Panelist
Alternative Title
Department
Haverford College. Department of Psychology
Type
Thesis
Original Format
Running Time
File Format
Place of Publication
Date Span
Copyright Date
Award
Language
eng
Note
Table of Contents
Terms of Use
Rights Holder
Access Restrictions
Haverford users only
Tripod URL
Identifier
Abstract
The present study seeks to address the disparity between pro-environmental attitudes and actual engagement in pro-environmental behaviors by proposing a route for inducing behavioral change. Festinger's (1957) theory of cognitive dissonance and Bandura's (1977) theory of selfefficacy are combined to suggest a stronger means for motivating behavior. One hundred eleven undergraduate students at Haverford and Bryn Mawr Colleges participated in one of six experimental conditions. Participants were primed for high or low self-efficacy beliefs and asked to either advocate for conservation, reflect upon past failures to conserve, or both advocate and reflect. Surveys assessed participants' pro-conservation and pro-environmental attitudes and selfefficacy beliefs, and various opportunities were offered to measure possible behavioral change. Past research has shown that public advocacy and private confession for a pro-social behavior can motivate behavioral change. The researchers proposed that high self-efficacy beliefs could augment pro-environmental behavior as a mechanism for dealing with hypocrisy, while low selfefficacy beliefs could inhibit pro-environmental behavior and increase negative attitudes towards conservation. None of the hypotheses was supported, but many directions for future research are offered.
Description
Citation
Collections