Afraid of Commitment: Gamal Abdel Nasser's Ephemeral Political Ideology - a New Definition of Nasserism

TRICERATOPS

TriCollege Digital Repository

Afraid of Commitment: Gamal Abdel Nasser's Ephemeral Political Ideology - a New Definition of Nasserism

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Graham, Lisa Jane
dc.contributor.advisor Kitroeff, Alexander
dc.contributor.author Friddell, Bo
dc.date.accessioned 2012-06-19T20:10:04Z
dc.date.available 2012-06-19T20:10:04Z
dc.date.issued 2012
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10066/8296
dc.description.abstract Gamal Abdel Nasser played an integral role in Middle East politics in the 1950s and 1960s. He led a military coup against the incumbent King, and then successfully converted his political capital into a national revolution. The transition of power occurred without major complications because of the socio-political conditions in Egypt at the time and because of Nasser's particular style of rule. Without a steadying, autocratic leader, Egypt likely would have fallen under the direction of a foreign power. Nasser used decisive action to stabilize Egypt's internal politics and prevent foreign agents from agitating Egypt's domestic stability. From this stability, he projected power at the regional level and remained independent from the major foreign powers that attempted to control Egypt. Egypt's geopolitical importance guaranteed its relevance in international politics. Foreign powers competed for the chance to control Egypt — a nation ideally situated to project power throughout the Middle East and North Africa. However, each contending superpower grew frustrated with Nasser because his rule relied on personal judgment, making Egypt's policies unpredictable and inconsistent. Nasser realized the value of his freedom to act and utilized this ability to retain Egyptian sovereignty. Scholars attempted to define Nasser's political ideology, but his policies were so ephemeral that they needed to create a new ideology — Nasserism — just to describe the man's political tendencies. I argue that Nasser was not ideological in the 20th century sense of the word, but that he harbored specific core concepts that framed his decisions. These concepts allowed him to select the best course of action without being hindered by ideological constraints. His political history — including his actions in times of crisis, his use of charismatic authority, his manipulation of nationalist sentiments, and his construction of a new Egyptian cultural identity — illustrates his flexibility and willingness to change tracks as long as his core concepts remained intact. en
dc.description.sponsorship Haverford College. Dept. of History
dc.language.iso en_US en
dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/us/
dc.subject.lcsh Egypt -- History -- 1952-1970
dc.subject.lcsh Egypt -- Politics and government -- 1952-1970
dc.subject.lcsh Nasser, Gamal Abdel, 1918-1970
dc.title Afraid of Commitment: Gamal Abdel Nasser's Ephemeral Political Ideology - a New Definition of Nasserism en
dc.type Thesis (B.A.) en


Files in this item

Files Description Size Format
2012FriddellB_thesis.pdf Thesis 863.4Kb PDF
2012FriddellB_release.pdf **Archive Staff Only** 21.55Kb PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/us/ Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/us/