Three Scenarios For US Energy Policy in the Arctic Region
Date
2009
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Producer
Director
Performer
Choreographer
Costume Designer
Music
Videographer
Lighting Designer
Set Designer
Crew Member
Funder
Rehearsal Director
Concert Coordinator
Advisor
Moderator
Panelist
Alternative Title
Department
Haverford College. Department of Political Science
Type
Thesis
Original Format
Running Time
File Format
Place of Publication
Date Span
Copyright Date
Award
Language
eng
Note
Table of Contents
Terms of Use
Rights Holder
Access Restrictions
Haverford users only
Terms of Use
Tripod URL
Identifier
Abstract
The Arctic is a region in crisis. Climate change in the Arctic Region has uncovered a wealth of oil and natural gas resources that are suddenly economically feasible and tempting to an energy thirsty world. New access to these treasures has unleashed competition for resources and influence over the Region. The United States has vital energy and national security interests in the Arctic that are now at risk. On March 27, 2009, the Russian government released a statement detailing its intention to build a military base in the Arctic to secure its energy resources and exert control over the Region. But the United States does not currently have a coherent Arctic energy and security policy. This paper examines three scenarios for Arctic energy policy – full scale drilling; moderate, restricted drilling; and a drilling ban. In view of the national security and environmental threats from Arctic energy exploitation, the paper concludes that the bold policy of a complete ban would best serve US interests.