Is a Player’s Role in Status Determination Important? A Cross-Cultural Study of the Impact of Own and Others’ Actions on Ultimatum Game Decisions

Date
2009
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Producer
Director
Performer
Choreographer
Costume Designer
Music
Videographer
Lighting Designer
Set Designer
Crew Member
Funder
Rehearsal Director
Concert Coordinator
Moderator
Panelist
Alternative Title
Department
Haverford College. Department of Economics
Type
Thesis
Original Format
Running Time
File Format
Place of Publication
Date Span
Copyright Date
Award
Language
eng
Note
Table of Contents
Terms of Use
Rights Holder
Access Restrictions
Open Access
Tripod URL
Identifier
Abstract
Economic theory suggests that individuals base their behavior in economic games on both payoff and fairness considerations. Cox et al. (2007) propose that fairness is a function of relative status. I propose that players consider not their relative status, but rather how that relative status is determined. Specifically, I test the difference between when that status is determined by the individuals and when it is determined by others. Additionally, I believe that by varying status determination I can test the relative importance of individual determination (self-reliance) and other determination (other-reliance). Apart from the inconclusive findings for responder behavior in one treatment, the results from the experiment I conduct in the United States support my theory that the role that the individual and others have in the determination of roles in the ultimatum game impacts what are perceived as reasonable and fair offers. The next step of my research is to test my predictions about the impact of cultural norms on the relative importance of other- and self-reliance by conducting the same experiment in Bolivia.
Description
Citation
Collections