Response Latency and Deception
Date
2015
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Producer
Director
Performer
Choreographer
Costume Designer
Music
Videographer
Lighting Designer
Set Designer
Crew Member
Funder
Rehearsal Director
Concert Coordinator
Advisor
Moderator
Panelist
Alternative Title
Department
Haverford College. Department of Psychology
Type
Thesis
Original Format
Running Time
File Format
Place of Publication
Date Span
Copyright Date
Award
Language
eng
Note
Table of Contents
Terms of Use
Rights Holder
Access Restrictions
Haverford users only
Terms of Use
Tripod URL
Identifier
Abstract
The purpose of the present study was to examine produced latencies as a cue to deception and the extent to which these were “calibrated” as a function of speaker gender, relationship, seriousness of lie, and lie type. Calibration was defined as the difference between a subject’s produced latency and their average switch pause duration (i.e. the time required for two conversational participants to exchange speaking roles). Male/female dyads were asked to enact a scripted conversation that contained 32 potential lies, with each speaker producing 16 responses. Half of the potential lies were self-oriented (benefiting the self) and the other half were other-oriented (benefiting another) and for each, half were serious and half were trivial. These conversations were digitally recorded and response-latency times were subsequently extracted. The results showed that participants were better calibrated for serious vs. trivial lies and, overall, women were better calibrated than men. In addition, a follow-up questionnaire showed that participants high in Machiavellianism, an interpersonal dimension of manipulativeness, were generally better calibrated for deception. These findings are discussed in terms of a perspective that considers deception relative to self-image.