Predictable Justice Systems: Community Desensitization of Violence and Capital Punishment Rates
Date
2015
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Producer
Director
Performer
Choreographer
Costume Designer
Music
Videographer
Lighting Designer
Set Designer
Crew Member
Funder
Rehearsal Director
Concert Coordinator
Advisor
Moderator
Panelist
Alternative Title
Department
Haverford College. Department of Economics
Type
Thesis
Original Format
Running Time
File Format
Place of Publication
Date Span
Copyright Date
Award
Language
eng
Note
Table of Contents
Terms of Use
Rights Holder
Access Restrictions
Open Access
Terms of Use
Tripod URL
Identifier
Abstract
Defining statutes for capital punishment crimes vary by state. Within states the distribution of capital sentences and number of executions vary greatly by county. Academics believe capital punishment to be arbitrary in nature. Previous literature has looked at the internal nature of individual sentences such as race of victim, race of convict, and severity of the homicide. Rather than looking at the characterizations of homicides that result in a capital sentence, examining the demographics and communities of the sentencing counties could explain the variation of sentences within a state. Specifically, counties with high exposure to institutionally mandated killing could be more inclined to issue capital punishment sentences than counties with a low tolerance for institutional violence. This research will use veteran populations as a proxy variable for a county’s desensitization level. Findings include significant predictive power of Vietnam and Gulf War veteran populations, and in some cases significant predictive power of overall veteran population. The magnitude and sign of Veteran coefficients indicate that different groups influence community judicial systems in opposing manners.