The Case for Coed Rooming

Date
2000
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Producer
Director
Performer
Choreographer
Costume Designer
Music
Videographer
Lighting Designer
Set Designer
Crew Member
Funder
Rehearsal Director
Concert Coordinator
Advisor
Moderator
Panelist
Alternative Title
Department
SQU IC Archival Collection
Type
Policy Change Proposal
Original Format
Running Time
File Format
Place of Publication
Date Span
Copyright Date
Award
Language
Note
Table of Contents
Terms of Use
Copyright Notice: Please be aware that materials you find here are governed by U.S. copyright law, and that to reproduce them for any purpose other than study may be a violation of federal law. If you wish to reproduce materials for any other reason, please contact Swarthmore Intercultural Center for permission at swarthmore.ic.archive@gmail.com.
Rights Holder
Access Restrictions
Terms of Use
Tripod URL
Identifier
Abstract
Description
A written case for coed housing options on campus on the basis that the rationale behind mandatory same-gender rooming is heterosexist and sexist, and that coed rooming options would be in line with Swarthmore's Quaker heritage of inclusion and social conscience, along with a frequently asked questions section. Handwritten notes indicate which student would present each part in a meeting with Myrt Westphal.
Citation