The Role of the State in Constructing Alternatives to Development
Date
2014
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Producer
Director
Performer
Choreographer
Costume Designer
Music
Videographer
Lighting Designer
Set Designer
Crew Member
Funder
Rehearsal Director
Concert Coordinator
Advisor
Moderator
Panelist
Alternative Title
Department
Haverford College. Department of Political Science
Type
Thesis
Original Format
Running Time
File Format
Place of Publication
Date Span
Copyright Date
Award
Language
eng
Note
Table of Contents
Terms of Use
Rights Holder
Access Restrictions
Haverford users only
Terms of Use
Tripod URL
Identifier
Abstract
Post‐development theorists argue that conventional development is a Eurocentric, imperialist discourse with authoritarian and technocratic implications--they assert that it suppresses the diversity of perspectives and traditions in the Global South by imposing Western conceptions of progress and knowledge and excluding the voices of those targeted by development efforts. In order to broaden the perspective of post‐development theory, it is essential to bring the state back in, rather than studying only grassroots alternatives to development. Bolivia cannot be called a "post‐development state," but neither can it be dismissed as a developmentalist state; the many contradictions of Bolivia's turn to the Left reveal that states and societies are too complex to adhere consistently to anyone paradigm. In some cases, we find clear evidence of efforts to move beyond development, but in others Bolivia seems to be enacting alternative development rather than post‐development. This tends to be because of a) the broadness of the "vivir bien" framework of Bolivia's new constitution, b) Bolivian society, like most societies, is so heterogeneous that any attempt to implement a certain policy will always meet with resistance from some sector or another, and c) If alternatives to development must be constructed according to the desires and worldviews of those who they affect, a state which designs and implements policies which might be deemed "post‐development" would have to be radically participatory. Unlike the conventional model of democratic states today, such a state would have to maintain strong, accessible channels for bottom‐up communication, contestation, and direction. Bolivia's constitution certainly contains some structures with these characteristics, but as a state with a legacy of hegemonic parties and political corruption, it is to be expected than an attempted transition to a structure which is more conducive to alternatives to development will be fraught with growing pains for some time.