The Effects of High-Stakes Standardized Testing on Students' Motivation and Achievement
Date
2013
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Producer
Director
Performer
Choreographer
Costume Designer
Music
Videographer
Lighting Designer
Set Designer
Crew Member
Funder
Rehearsal Director
Concert Coordinator
Advisor
Moderator
Panelist
Alternative Title
Department
Haverford College. Department of Psychology
Type
Thesis
Original Format
Running Time
File Format
Place of Publication
Date Span
Copyright Date
Award
Language
eng
Note
Table of Contents
Terms of Use
Rights Holder
Access Restrictions
Haverford users only
Terms of Use
Tripod URL
Identifier
Abstract
This paper examines the relationships between high-stakes standardized testing and students' motivation and learning. Previous research suggests that the Behaviorist Theory (Berridge, 2001), on which the system of standardized testing is based, does not promote the positive cognitive processes necessary for achievement. By focusing on three learner-centered psychological theories, Self-Determination Theory (Deci et al., 1991; Deci & Ryan, 2000; Krapp, 2005), Attribution Theory (Weiner, 1979), and Goal Theory (Anderman & Midgley, 1998), this paper argues that the system of high-stakes testing should be altered to maximize students' performance. Research indicates that effective learning occurs when students are intrinsically motivated, actively engaged, recognize the relevance of the material, are interested, and have the opportunity to work collaboratively. Few of these things are addressed in high-stakes testing; in fact, standardized testing virtually ignores these necessary components of learning. While this paper will focus primarily on the cognitive factors, and the individual differences among them, that relate to motivation, it should be acknowledged that developmental factors influence the effect of testing on motivation as well.