From Disgust to Desire: Transcending Normative Ideals Through Oscillation in Lolita
Date
2013
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Producer
Director
Performer
Choreographer
Costume Designer
Music
Videographer
Lighting Designer
Set Designer
Crew Member
Funder
Rehearsal Director
Concert Coordinator
Advisor
Moderator
Panelist
Alternative Title
Department
Haverford College. Department of English
Type
Thesis
Original Format
Running Time
File Format
Place of Publication
Date Span
Copyright Date
Award
Language
eng
Note
Table of Contents
Terms of Use
Rights Holder
Access Restrictions
Haverford users only
Terms of Use
Tripod URL
Identifier
Abstract
The narrative of Lolita is designed to incite an oscillation in the reader between feelings of desire and disgust. Humbert conveys his desire for Dolores, the 12‐year‐old girl‐child, and invites the reader to share in his utopian fantasy. At the same time, Humbert recounts his desire through motifs that strike both us – the readers – and him as disgusting: The invocation of the predator‐prey dynamic, and characterization of Dolores as a demoniac, bewitching creature prove disgusting. An analysis of Lolita’s narrative structure suggests that Nabokov narrates Humbert’s desire. His narration shrouds what transpires in radical ambiguity, arousing the reader’s desire for textual mastery. The narrative structure is designed to make us complicit in the disgusting, and thus demonstrates how entangled desire and disgust really are. Nabokov impresses on the reader how disgust intermingled with desire creates proximity to the object of disgust and can make ethical judgment of deviant desire problematic. Nabokov demonstrates how disgust reinforces the designation of certain desires as deviant, and sustains ideals of normality. Humbert’s and Nabokov’s views on the power of disgust diverge: Humbert strives to divest disgust of its power to reinforce taboos. He argues that beneath the veneer of socially sanctioned normalcy sexual desires, we are all sexually deviant. While Nabokov also acknowledges that the norms of sexuality to which we are held are narrow and idealistic, he does not suggest draining disgust of its power to uphold these norms. Instead, Nabokov urges the reader to cultivate a more critical understanding of disgust, how we are complicit in it and how it functions to reproduce social norms. The novel ends with a moment where even Humbert can achieve, through a more critical and nuanced view of disgust, a balance between his own personal, and idealized societal scripts for desire.