Restorative Justice Doesn’t Work? In an effort to re-conceptualize punishment and to reevaluate restorative justice from the perspective of culture and ritual
Date
2010
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Producer
Director
Performer
Choreographer
Costume Designer
Music
Videographer
Lighting Designer
Set Designer
Crew Member
Funder
Rehearsal Director
Concert Coordinator
Advisor
Moderator
Panelist
Alternative Title
Department
Haverford College. Department of Sociology
Type
Thesis
Original Format
Running Time
File Format
Place of Publication
Date Span
Copyright Date
Award
Language
eng
Note
Table of Contents
Terms of Use
Rights Holder
Access Restrictions
Open Access
Terms of Use
Tripod URL
Identifier
Abstract
I assess ritual theory and its relevance and workability in explaining postmodern Western societies, and I thereby arrive at a functional definition for ritual. I center this functional definition within cultural theories in sociology, arguing that the crux of human action remains squarely within ritualistic meaning making processes that reinforce values and (when needed) redress deviance. Punishment, therefore, is a kind of ritual. Punishment is a name for ritual when it redresses deviance. Restorative justice is another name for the same kind of ritual. I further structurally distinguish between punishment and restorative justice, arguing that they are functionally equivalent. I achieve this argument by asserting that all ritual activity in postmodern Western societies is procedural: ritualistic and oriented to rational egalitarian values. Though restorative justice is different in form than punishment, it takes the same function as punishment in Western societies in so far as all restorative justice processes retain some "sanctioning" component. No restorative justice process is successful in redressing deviance in postmodern Western societies without at least the threat of negative sanctions, which would rest in the background.